VAR - the main character of the World Cup

Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi both failed to score. The best goalkeeper in the world David de Gea is difficult to accept. Finally, the name of the World Cup 2018 up to this point is not super, but it is ... VAR.
VAR - the main character of the World Cup
World Cup schedule

Controversy forever is controversial
The latest argument, perhaps also the loudest: the referee did not decide when the penalty Marcos Rojo (Argentina) to touch the ball in the match against Nigeria dawn. This is certainly the most voracious situation to date, as it not only determines the penalty or not, but also determines the game and determines the fate of the "giants" Argentina.

The problem here is VAR ... there is no help, for anyone, in that situation! The referees themselves have clearly seen what they need to see (and he reserves the view after review, at the request of the VAR). Viewers also see clearly through the slow-motion images on television. The argument is that each person views and concludes the nature of things in a different direction. Whether the problem is not clear or not. In this case, the VAR is superfluous.
Also, is it debatable whether Cristiano Ronaldo deserves a penalty or is worthy of kicking out, purely because of different views, when all look the same picture. When FIFA says that the VAR is valid, or the commentator thinks that the great majority of the decisions from the VAR are true, that is a "black jackass". The truth is, in most cases, the referee is right, if not "VAR" requested review. Clear the court, VAR reminded to review, the referee re-pointing to the penalty. And concluded: great VAR!

Yes, but the controversy in football is endless. And the VAR is great in that it raises the debate at this World Cup (nothing to argue, football will die). Ball biting about 1mm, the force in the penalty area to hit the player or not, or offside players under the opponent a few millimeters - then controversial life. Get 10 times the VAR, let's say just one review and think about tens of seconds.

No VAR, still controversial
The World Cup is not over. The referee is still very wrong, and all are wrong "dead". Harry Kane (England) was twice fouled in the Tunisian penalty area. Steven Zuber (Switzerland) made a mistake before scoring against Brazil. That's the conclusion from the slow-motion image. But there are situations where the VAR does not inform and ask the referee to review. In fact, Brazil has sent a written request for FIFA to explain why the VAR does not require the referee to review the situation Zuber scored (and another situation: Gabriel Jesus fell in the restricted area).

Yes, VAR has caused quite a bit of controversy. And people have to argue in cases where ... VAR does not speak up. Set up the system to remind the referee, do not mention when the need to remind is also the wrong place, the injustice. Of course, telling FIFA (even ... the house on the betting market) that anyone would like to see it, is too fake. But people have the right to be upset, before the reality of why there are important situations, the referee is obviously wrong, which VAR does not interfere?

In principle, VAR only interferes in critical situations (errors leading to yellow cards are not important situations, so the VAR does not intervene). And this is the source of some irony, if not ridiculous. The referee reviewed and changed the decision, not giving Brazil a penalty. Which means: he was deceived by Neymar by "eating". Why not yellow card penalty Neymar? VAR does not "yellow" in the yellow card case, but just because the rule that the referee does not dare to penalize Neymar - on the basis he realized he was cheated, not because the VAR "prompt"?